Donald Trump's Third Term


 During the Third Term of Donald Trump, the AI of our national-security forces will detect an attack from a sub-par AI attack of an adversary aimed at the U.S. And, due to nanosecond throughput, our forces will launch before a technician or a general or our dear president mitigates or even knows. In short, systems between adversaries are locked together (including those with poor electronics to those up-to-date and very sophisticated). The reader should know that in 2026, the Russians had troubles distinguishing cirrus clouds from ICBMs. So imagine the level of reliability of N. Korea and Iranian weapons!

Also in 2026, we discovered that at significant sites the mathematic capabilities of the system were corrupted---moving Rob Joyce, Christ Inglis, Bruce Schneier, and Jan Easterly (among others) to warn of the acute chaos about to unravel in cyber security. Alas, Donald Trump, in his 80s and spared of Alzheimer disease, will choose between mitigating or promoting an even larger apocalypse initiated already by silicon chips. So you can see I am more worried by chips like "Mythos" than I am of president Trump. And I most worried of Trump in the midst of all of this. 

The reader isn't free to abandon ship here. This is clearly about the growing years of your grandchildren. And it is about the adult years of your children. I am describing the nuclear war attached to the cyber war even as humans get replaced by AGI robotics. More and more the remnant of humanity will be found in the African jungles and the forests of the Amazon River. And even they may die out due to the nuclear climate and the radiation fall-out. You commit suicide or you kill your neighbor to get their food. You can't be angry about AI replacing you as someone must run the planet. 

So let us stop worrying about Mr. Trump and whether a man who stood against the Constitution in 2021 should be defending the Constitution in 2029.

#nuclearwar #cyberwar #Trump #AI 

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

American Republic. American Public.

Image
     Can we turn away from Trump and place the mirror upon everyone else? The wealthy getting the tax changes they want. The corporations paying no taxes. The military wanting more dollars to buy from the wealthy corporations. The elected officials who represent the wealthy, the corporations, and the military. Where lies the meaning of the relevant and significant phrase "of the people, by the people, for the people"?     Every Republican Party member should be a democrat. I don't think any of them are. If you don't believe in athletics, why say you believe in baseball? And without the commitment to democracy, why promote the necessity of a republic? What the Republican Party does believe in is the wealthy, the corporations, and the military. What they say doesn't matter; what they do does.  And it is no better with the Democratic Party. Kamala Harris or Joe Biden are not wonderful just because you won't vote for Trump. All of it...simply all of it is domin...
Read more
Image
AI: Suicidal Tool  Within ten years AGI robotics will replace humanity---a remnant of us might be allowed to exist in the forests of S. America and Africa. We might be slaves...we might be pets...we might be hunted. (See "Colossus: Forbin Project".) We certainly will be a remnant. And yet it won't happen... Long before the "end of the world", we will be committing mass suicide, escaping into drugs, ending marriages, creating no children, and committing violence against our neighbor on a daily basis in order to survive. What will happen is the collapse of the Internet; and it will not be a "Mudge"-like domain strike of bringing the Internet down. No, it will be no one will use it. It will be too dangerous to use---AI striking everywhere under mafia, terrorist, lone hacking, and nation-state attacks. A certain percentage of non-usage will collapse the remaining usage. Imagine your backyard has been planted with several mines. No one is preventing you fro...
Read more

Future Candidates

Image
 All candidates---not just presidential ones---should be required to have a felony record, be an insurrectionist, be experienced in using government agencies for personal reasons, have spoken out against the physically challenged, disrespected former intelligence officers, been challenged by House of Representatives' findings, succeeded against two impeachments, did not report financial status, reduced human relationships to deals, re-named parts of the globe, convinced people to follow speeches and not vote on the record, created animations of dumping manure on voters and...geez...I forgot why I was writing today?
Read more